Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 14:25:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 522216C66103224F1DA440FE21C3FA5DABDC4D84415A27D2C65A421A02B81128
Participant Details

Original Note:

L' immunité présidentielle en matière civile n'a été reconnue par la Cour suprême que récemment (Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 751 (1982)). Cette immunité ne le protège pas contre des actes d'ordre purement privés (Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 693-94 (1997)). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-president-des-etats-unis-dans-la-jurisprudence-de-la-cour-supreme https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/#:~:text=Jones%2C%20520%20U.S.%20681%20(1997)&text=The%20Sixth%20Amendment%20right%20to,executive%20immunity%20does%20not%20apply.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796532518650290394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 522216C66103224F1DA440FE21C3FA5DABDC4D84415A27D2C65A421A02B81128
  • createdAtMillis - 1717165559561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796532518650290394522216C66103224F1DA440FE21C3FA5DABDC4D84415A27D2C65A421A02B81128