Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 11:56:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E406E84F8AE76F66440C08640D9B5F13D92897E92D7F461278E841521B14EB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

L' immunité présidentielle en matière civile n'a été reconnue par la Cour suprême que récemment (Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 751 (1982)). Cette immunité ne le protège pas contre des actes d'ordre purement privés (Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 693-94 (1997)). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-president-des-etats-unis-dans-la-jurisprudence-de-la-cour-supreme https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/#:~:text=Jones%2C%20520%20U.S.%20681%20(1997)&text=The%20Sixth%20Amendment%20right%20to,executive%20immunity%20does%20not%20apply.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796532518650290394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E406E84F8AE76F66440C08640D9B5F13D92897E92D7F461278E841521B14EB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1717242981925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17965325186502903942E406E84F8AE76F66440C08640D9B5F13D92897E92D7F461278E841521B14EB7