Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 15:10:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F862BFDB31CC9FB3658D1DE2D181E4052A5C8795A3F258BF05834E249DC16E6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anyone who followed the trial cannot ignore the unprecedented extra judicial actions by the judge. The prosecution was dramatically flawed. Election interference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796480509272318392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F862BFDB31CC9FB3658D1DE2D181E4052A5C8795A3F258BF05834E249DC16E6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1717168223331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796480509272318392F862BFDB31CC9FB3658D1DE2D181E4052A5C8795A3F258BF05834E249DC16E6B