Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 12:53:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B094A9561FD9349C0C266AFE347F1C848D4A30947E2272C53121B8E4A94D3223
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anyone who followed the trial cannot ignore the unprecedented extra judicial actions by the judge. The prosecution was dramatically flawed. Election interference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796480509272318392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B094A9561FD9349C0C266AFE347F1C848D4A30947E2272C53121B8E4A94D3223
  • createdAtMillis - 1717160034850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796480509272318392B094A9561FD9349C0C266AFE347F1C848D4A30947E2272C53121B8E4A94D3223