Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 10:33:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A05209FE999BD3FD33C3D9B492C78F8297205A85D9E5E6B9CC2E1B8835E36AF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anyone who followed the trial cannot ignore the unprecedented extra judicial actions by the judge. The prosecution was dramatically flawed. Election interference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796480509272318392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A05209FE999BD3FD33C3D9B492C78F8297205A85D9E5E6B9CC2E1B8835E36AF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1717151639967
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796480509272318392A05209FE999BD3FD33C3D9B492C78F8297205A85D9E5E6B9CC2E1B8835E36AF9