Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 07:06:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anyone who followed the trial cannot ignore the unprecedented extra judicial actions by the judge. The prosecution was dramatically flawed. Election interference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796480509272318392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717225594174
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17964805092723183922C0B6C8622426BFE647D56D102B714C1D01C31B0F5A3FCA831567F63BEAFB77A