Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 20:43:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90C5CC5B209AA916621B4E957DD2A5F567B75C25BD46475B6B3797F1240029FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP did not make any claims as to the appeals court. The statement made by the OP is an opinion by observation. Any clarification should be done in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796360946706685987
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90C5CC5B209AA916621B4E957DD2A5F567B75C25BD46475B6B3797F1240029FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1717188232165
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179636094670668598790C5CC5B209AA916621B4E957DD2A5F567B75C25BD46475B6B3797F1240029FC