Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 16:57:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94C7C7476B16A02E11FFD399552B2332F42DC3FD1D71830E16B8F214577CF451
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person suggesting a note is needed is confusing archaeologists and anthropologists, and is also missing recent advances in archaeology. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jan/16/archaeology-sexual-revolution-bones-sex-dna-birka-lovers

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796330762158985399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94C7C7476B16A02E11FFD399552B2332F42DC3FD1D71830E16B8F214577CF451
  • createdAtMillis - 1717174630314
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179633076215898539994C7C7476B16A02E11FFD399552B2332F42DC3FD1D71830E16B8F214577CF451