Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 01:54:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A1B30CA6EC5EBECB7F70B90B97A342273A06F1F65FDCED8B6C53F5CFA6980E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rolling Stone is not actually a news publication, having been proven to publish fake stories in the past. One should act cautiously when reading this publication https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2019/dec/29/rolling-stone-rape-story-uva-five-years https://abcnews.go.com/2020/deepdive/how-retracted-rolling-stone-article-rape-on-campus-came-print-42701166

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1796320320283893931
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8A1B30CA6EC5EBECB7F70B90B97A342273A06F1F65FDCED8B6C53F5CFA6980E3
createdAtMillis - 1717120468638
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17963203202838939318A1B30CA6EC5EBECB7F70B90B97A342273A06F1F65FDCED8B6C53F5CFA6980E3