Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 15:46:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9362AEFFCBAD9391AEA53A8D955AC69B5A5C451CEF26112834EEE6ACE15A0A58
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note is valid and accurate. But IMO, having the CN can diminish the comedic value before the joke is actually seen, causing the effort that went into creating this to be wasted The alt text does explain but still it's inconsequential to genuinely believe it either way

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796240089342951702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9362AEFFCBAD9391AEA53A8D955AC69B5A5C451CEF26112834EEE6ACE15A0A58
  • createdAtMillis - 1717256786555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17962400893429517029362AEFFCBAD9391AEA53A8D955AC69B5A5C451CEF26112834EEE6ACE15A0A58