Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 11:03:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

These figures are based on estimates, described by the Financial Times as “highly contentious, as they require impartial officials to answer questions based on assumptions crafted by political advisers”. https://www.ft.com/content/a268da06-a421-4bfc-96a6-b6f72178e724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796154518062678452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1717153385081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1796154518062678452858A4E55F3434B8959BDDD21D9359622920A3A7917D4ED17CBA3CF42E137FDA1