Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 09:15:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B636D1070F945C54A87C5169238F66234AD7D3FDC48555B632972486EFE25E59
Participant Details

Original Note:

These figures are based on estimates, described by the Financial Times as “highly contentious, as they require impartial officials to answer questions based on assumptions crafted by political advisers”. https://www.ft.com/content/a268da06-a421-4bfc-96a6-b6f72178e724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796094497899560998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B636D1070F945C54A87C5169238F66234AD7D3FDC48555B632972486EFE25E59
  • createdAtMillis - 1717060528540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1796094497899560998B636D1070F945C54A87C5169238F66234AD7D3FDC48555B632972486EFE25E59