Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 09:02:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2C0F651B034462E4B22BE172401AC92F32A42B96D32668536EB5072542D6A4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

These figures are based on estimates, described by the Financial Times as “highly contentious, as they require impartial officials to answer questions based on assumptions crafted by political advisers”. https://www.ft.com/content/a268da06-a421-4bfc-96a6-b6f72178e724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796094497899560998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2C0F651B034462E4B22BE172401AC92F32A42B96D32668536EB5072542D6A4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1717059741681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796094497899560998A2C0F651B034462E4B22BE172401AC92F32A42B96D32668536EB5072542D6A4F