Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 15:13:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73AF46BEA2885AF95DC0F4905C6A5485FA1E1206EF4C985CC2F3A5E3D27A4729
Participant Details

Original Note:

These figures are based on estimates, described by the Financial Times as “highly contentious, as they require impartial officials to answer questions based on assumptions crafted by political advisers”. https://www.ft.com/content/a268da06-a421-4bfc-96a6-b6f72178e724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796094497899560998
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73AF46BEA2885AF95DC0F4905C6A5485FA1E1206EF4C985CC2F3A5E3D27A4729
  • createdAtMillis - 1717082025994
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179609449789956099873AF46BEA2885AF95DC0F4905C6A5485FA1E1206EF4C985CC2F3A5E3D27A4729