Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 10:13:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935
Participant Details

Original Note:

These figures are based on estimates, described by the Financial Times as “highly contentious, as they require impartial officials to answer questions based on assumptions crafted by political advisers”. https://www.ft.com/content/a268da06-a421-4bfc-96a6-b6f72178e724

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796083537180782702
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935
  • createdAtMillis - 1717064030176
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17960835371807827029084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935