Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 07:28:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 212ECDC442A0CE49BBE4F1FCA1E7D254C201182A507654DAC36DFAF064AC62CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vigilantism is illegal due to privacy violations, potential for harm, and lack of authority for law enforcement actions. It risks criminal charges and civil liability. See legal references: Federal Wiretap Act: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 Impersonation of Law Enforcement: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912 Vigilantism: https://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/crime/vigilantism/.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796023307235406298
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 212ECDC442A0CE49BBE4F1FCA1E7D254C201182A507654DAC36DFAF064AC62CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1717054122082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796023307235406298212ECDC442A0CE49BBE4F1FCA1E7D254C201182A507654DAC36DFAF064AC62CB