Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 18:00:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5CD5855179832C69FA3A341D1E0B35C3EAD3A83865BD1DBA8CCB1CC08F13666
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The SCOTUS decision is super interesting. Has nothing to do with the post, because no one is looking to prosecute Alito. Saying he should not sit for the case is not attempting to criminally punish him for his (wife) free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795986828694036804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5CD5855179832C69FA3A341D1E0B35C3EAD3A83865BD1DBA8CCB1CC08F13666
  • createdAtMillis - 1717092028912
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795986828694036804A5CD5855179832C69FA3A341D1E0B35C3EAD3A83865BD1DBA8CCB1CC08F13666