Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 06:42:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 683C80EE47FC65A6C70C05B2EB9720F498038FADA60FE865409BD4D7541244D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The SCOTUS decision is super interesting. Has nothing to do with the post, because no one is looking to prosecute Alito. Saying he should not sit for the case is not attempting to criminally punish him for his (wife) free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795986828694036804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 683C80EE47FC65A6C70C05B2EB9720F498038FADA60FE865409BD4D7541244D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1717051327161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795986828694036804683C80EE47FC65A6C70C05B2EB9720F498038FADA60FE865409BD4D7541244D8