Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 04:53:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58161AA040D86ECE464C557901582E7E6FB8FB71C9B755C83B8F66969F21CA7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The SCOTUS decision is super interesting. Has nothing to do with the post, because no one is looking to prosecute Alito. Saying he should not sit for the case is not attempting to criminally punish him for his (wife) free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795986828694036804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58161AA040D86ECE464C557901582E7E6FB8FB71C9B755C83B8F66969F21CA7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1717131220974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179598682869403680458161AA040D86ECE464C557901582E7E6FB8FB71C9B755C83B8F66969F21CA7B