Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 04:16:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E37EBEB902DA8ED92E012B87019737060D9BAF8E63D2B81B6FBD4DC52903C06
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The SCOTUS decision is super interesting. Has nothing to do with the post, because no one is looking to prosecute Alito. Saying he should not sit for the case is not attempting to criminally punish him for his (wife) free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795986828694036804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E37EBEB902DA8ED92E012B87019737060D9BAF8E63D2B81B6FBD4DC52903C06
  • createdAtMillis - 1717042569133
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17959868286940368042E37EBEB902DA8ED92E012B87019737060D9BAF8E63D2B81B6FBD4DC52903C06