Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 15:24:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 142E3971AA49D73D98CAEF7CB09A619C23E16F8E59D918227E79A178144FC6DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The SCOTUS decision is super interesting. Has nothing to do with the post, because no one is looking to prosecute Alito. Saying he should not sit for the case is not attempting to criminally punish him for his (wife) free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795986828694036804
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 142E3971AA49D73D98CAEF7CB09A619C23E16F8E59D918227E79A178144FC6DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1717082673311
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795986828694036804142E3971AA49D73D98CAEF7CB09A619C23E16F8E59D918227E79A178144FC6DB