Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 06:31:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ADEDA2B010540F4126036B8492F4FD2F79D1C427C8AC19C71253EDF80746933
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note est trompeuse car elle considère la vitesse constante au long du trajet ce qui est rarement possible. Par exemple la vitesse moyenne en ville est proche de 40km/h, dépasser les limitations sur une courte période n'aurais pas d'impact significatif sur la durée du trajet. https://www.onisr.securite-routiere.gouv.fr/etudes-et-recherches/comportements-en-circulation/observations/observatoire-des-vitesses

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1795956798668644609
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1ADEDA2B010540F4126036B8492F4FD2F79D1C427C8AC19C71253EDF80746933
createdAtMillis - 1717050719338
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17959567986686446091ADEDA2B010540F4126036B8492F4FD2F79D1C427C8AC19C71253EDF80746933