Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 20:55:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5802616A1FE9D686FAB23727C55D582D45FDFBF496B40E3AFFA6EF7AE397E97
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Judge Merchan’s jury instructions violate Richardson v. US is misleading. Richardson v. US (1999) dealt with jury unanimity in criminal cases. Judge Merchan's instructions comply with legal standards and do not contradict this ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/813/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795903899372605588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5802616A1FE9D686FAB23727C55D582D45FDFBF496B40E3AFFA6EF7AE397E97
  • createdAtMillis - 1717016119424
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795903899372605588D5802616A1FE9D686FAB23727C55D582D45FDFBF496B40E3AFFA6EF7AE397E97