Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 05:13:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97515CADF65C453D29002ED3B777C2273FE9CC69E7FBC898F63673DBA7092FD0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Judge Merchan’s jury instructions violate Richardson v. US is misleading. Richardson v. US (1999) dealt with jury unanimity in criminal cases. Judge Merchan's instructions comply with legal standards and do not contradict this ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/813/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795903899372605588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97515CADF65C453D29002ED3B777C2273FE9CC69E7FBC898F63673DBA7092FD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1717046014684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179590389937260558897515CADF65C453D29002ED3B777C2273FE9CC69E7FBC898F63673DBA7092FD0