Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 21:04:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D14C5C93A6DCB4BE0DF582CE1DDCAD4FA950FD14EA070EEB0C2A8882681F05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Judge Merchan’s jury instructions violate Richardson v. US is misleading. Richardson v. US (1999) dealt with jury unanimity in criminal cases. Judge Merchan's instructions comply with legal standards and do not contradict this ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/813/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795903899372605588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D14C5C93A6DCB4BE0DF582CE1DDCAD4FA950FD14EA070EEB0C2A8882681F05D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717016686704
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17959038993726055887D14C5C93A6DCB4BE0DF582CE1DDCAD4FA950FD14EA070EEB0C2A8882681F05D