Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 22:45:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Judge Merchan’s jury instructions violate Richardson v. US is misleading. Richardson v. US (1999) dealt with jury unanimity in criminal cases. Judge Merchan's instructions comply with legal standards and do not contradict this ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/813/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795903899372605588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1717022730023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795903899372605588462C1F744B7BB4F22AA417DBFBC0674DBBBDF525AB4EBA556EFEAA5C19537BBF