Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 20:33:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0955C8A7F4C4AF175B876B97C3022F9A778A68C321296C12484D18DBF6C598D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Judge Merchan’s jury instructions violate Richardson v. US is misleading. Richardson v. US (1999) dealt with jury unanimity in criminal cases. Judge Merchan's instructions comply with legal standards and do not contradict this ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/813/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795903899372605588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0955C8A7F4C4AF175B876B97C3022F9A778A68C321296C12484D18DBF6C598D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1717014818957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17959038993726055880955C8A7F4C4AF175B876B97C3022F9A778A68C321296C12484D18DBF6C598D7