Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 21:39:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post does not say anything about peer review not being part of the process of science. It just says that peer review doesn't make something science. Note is not needed, the person objecting to this post should have replied to challenge it. Stop abusing community notes!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795886921018737082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1717018742059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795886921018737082851BEEBE6F7D80CD0243575B4498DA97DC572736A9109FA3C234A339187932F2