Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 21:09:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CD8A788B9A19B48EA5CD05FF34297A9DCE8D25BD8002C565BF863C846A370FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN — Ramos v. Louisiana addressed the constitutionality of non-unanimous jury verdicts in criminal cases. The ruling ensures a uniform standard for jury verdicts across all states, reinforcing the Sixth Amendment’s protection in state courts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-5924_n6io.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795851107367022654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CD8A788B9A19B48EA5CD05FF34297A9DCE8D25BD8002C565BF863C846A370FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1717016998766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17958511073670226545CD8A788B9A19B48EA5CD05FF34297A9DCE8D25BD8002C565BF863C846A370FA