Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 22:24:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97A32847F29B631517BE7269813719EA3F719470F21093C48401C78F25646948
Participant Details

Original Note:

John Clauser is not a climate scientist. He has 0 published papers. He's debunked here: https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2023/11/clauser-ology-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs/ His claim that climate models don't take clouds into consideration is wrong. He is also wrong that clouds are a negative feedback. And he miscalculates the effect of CO2 on the climate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795828001340575906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97A32847F29B631517BE7269813719EA3F719470F21093C48401C78F25646948
  • createdAtMillis - 1717021499071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179582800134057590697A32847F29B631517BE7269813719EA3F719470F21093C48401C78F25646948