Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 19:49:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3ACA46989FEFA06219609A9271914356F0ADA48676D46EEC91FEF64B17566540
Participant Details

Original Note:

John Clauser is not a climate scientist. He has 0 published papers. He's debunked here: https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2023/11/clauser-ology-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs/ His claim that climate models don't take clouds into consideration is wrong. He is also wrong that clouds are a negative feedback. And he miscalculates the effect of CO2 on the climate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795828001340575906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3ACA46989FEFA06219609A9271914356F0ADA48676D46EEC91FEF64B17566540
  • createdAtMillis - 1717012169217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17958280013405759063ACA46989FEFA06219609A9271914356F0ADA48676D46EEC91FEF64B17566540