Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 16:40:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EE5EC72E97BFA16048DDD9A10733906202309CD312AAF43F295CECF2775F398
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cabe nota sim visto que a suposta sátira diz que tal comentário é protegido por lei e isso simplesmente não é verdade. Esse tipo de comentário foi, e continua sendo, crime de calúnia tipificado pelo artigo 138 do código penal. https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra?codteor=1225916#:~:text=Cal%C3%BAnia-,Art.,imputa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%2C%20a%20propala%20ou%20divulga.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795751656115589550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EE5EC72E97BFA16048DDD9A10733906202309CD312AAF43F295CECF2775F398
  • createdAtMillis - 1717000850082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17957516561155895505EE5EC72E97BFA16048DDD9A10733906202309CD312AAF43F295CECF2775F398