Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 14:19:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 934CA82D25FE32085B4216709A0D001BF94C2D3E08284266A925DB13654A0742
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est dommage de voir une chaîne journalistique choisir qui peut répondre à son tweet. Cela montre que la parole est clos. Si un échange n'est pas envisageable, pourquoi afficher cela sur X. https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2019/01/06/97001-20190106FILWWW00109-plainte-d-un-journaliste-bloque-par-richard-ferrand.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795725004740456576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 934CA82D25FE32085B4216709A0D001BF94C2D3E08284266A925DB13654A0742
  • createdAtMillis - 1716992389653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1795725004740456576934CA82D25FE32085B4216709A0D001BF94C2D3E08284266A925DB13654A0742