Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 09:39:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the Telegraph article does specify the number of people involved in the research. Although small the analysis of the population sample is statistically relevant, particularly when the percentages are as high as 40%-70% for some dysfunctions. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-024-05779-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795717126629601596
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1716975555691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795717126629601596FE25333669F4DF2E27D14A9F975205963731F1CA4E6483106765CCD8B2605F4D