Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 17:56:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3815732434BA3AF521AB0F777DC9FEA60167569278E3C3FB25EA346E27A0A8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the Telegraph article does specify the number of people involved in the research. Although small the analysis of the population sample is statistically relevant, particularly when the percentages are as high as 40%-70% for some dysfunctions. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-024-05779-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795717126629601596
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3815732434BA3AF521AB0F777DC9FEA60167569278E3C3FB25EA346E27A0A8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1717005399892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795717126629601596A3815732434BA3AF521AB0F777DC9FEA60167569278E3C3FB25EA346E27A0A8F