Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 13:57:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 406B1B314A5E30C35092FAFC4EC00B9378703F41A091F3D3846748E4D5E892A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

"loss" doesn't count random "noise" in many contexts original tweet is right in those contexts, wrong in others NNN, both contexts are well established see link in proposed note! wiki defines "lossless" as 0 loss of "information" but wiki also defines information as NOT random https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795612383446007837
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 406B1B314A5E30C35092FAFC4EC00B9378703F41A091F3D3846748E4D5E892A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716991077430
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795612383446007837406B1B314A5E30C35092FAFC4EC00B9378703F41A091F3D3846748E4D5E892A4