Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-30 07:01:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37A9A63BEFACE2040DDEE8B69E40EB111E9F81F4502CED42453E4B3E63424D47
Participant Details

Original Note:

"loss" doesn't count random "noise" in many contexts original tweet is right in those contexts, wrong in others NNN, both contexts are well established see link in proposed note! wiki defines "lossless" as 0 loss of "information" but wiki also defines information as NOT random https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795612383446007837
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37A9A63BEFACE2040DDEE8B69E40EB111E9F81F4502CED42453E4B3E63424D47
  • createdAtMillis - 1717052481565
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179561238344600783737A9A63BEFACE2040DDEE8B69E40EB111E9F81F4502CED42453E4B3E63424D47