Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 20:41:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9ED183B1C2531917526E724E93E02D07E5B3F168ABA9CE50C9642AE412204835
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Potential misconduct” There are no factual claims that Justice Merchan has performed any misconduct in or before this trial. Stefanik implies judge assignment isn't random yet has no complaints over judge assignment for Trump’s classified docs case. Inflammatory rhetoric. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/complaint-dismissed-against-trump-hush-money-judge-who-donated-biden-2024-05-17/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795601692232188025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9ED183B1C2531917526E724E93E02D07E5B3F168ABA9CE50C9642AE412204835
  • createdAtMillis - 1717015306590
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17956016922321880259ED183B1C2531917526E724E93E02D07E5B3F168ABA9CE50C9642AE412204835