Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 01:11:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Potential misconduct” There are no factual claims that Justice Merchan has performed any misconduct in or before this trial. Stefanik implies judge assignment isn't random yet has no complaints over judge assignment for Trump’s classified docs case. Inflammatory rhetoric. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/complaint-dismissed-against-trump-hush-money-judge-who-donated-biden-2024-05-17/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795601692232188025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92
  • createdAtMillis - 1716945077794
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17956016922321880256FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92