Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 12:02:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D836164622C82C1189344BA978ABF392461C3E89862F02F0CB409FDF7521554
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Potential misconduct” There are no factual claims that Justice Merchan has performed any misconduct in or before this trial. Stefanik implies judge assignment isn't random yet has no complaints over judge assignment for Trump’s classified docs case. Inflammatory rhetoric. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/complaint-dismissed-against-trump-hush-money-judge-who-donated-biden-2024-05-17/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795601692232188025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D836164622C82C1189344BA978ABF392461C3E89862F02F0CB409FDF7521554
  • createdAtMillis - 1716984133487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17956016922321880256D836164622C82C1189344BA978ABF392461C3E89862F02F0CB409FDF7521554