Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 00:42:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58BB68730946FC48D45D38285B7BFD49DE462AC9985000652E54203347F5A882
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Potential misconduct” There are no factual claims that Justice Merchan has performed any misconduct in or before this trial. Stefanik implies judge assignment isn't random yet has no complaints over judge assignment for Trump’s classified docs case. Inflammatory rhetoric. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/complaint-dismissed-against-trump-hush-money-judge-who-donated-biden-2024-05-17/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795601692232188025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58BB68730946FC48D45D38285B7BFD49DE462AC9985000652E54203347F5A882
  • createdAtMillis - 1717116178050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179560169223218802558BB68730946FC48D45D38285B7BFD49DE462AC9985000652E54203347F5A882