Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-28 12:29:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 265D90127C443765C115D53AA7E3C403C8AA422E9284E9F8461DE06232A572B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est important de rappeler que toute annotation sur un bulletin rend ce dernier « nul », et n’est donc pas comptabilisé. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vote_nul#:~:text=En%20France%2C%20le%20code%20%C3%A9lectoral,r%C3%A9sultat%20d'un%20scrutin%20public.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795397274194899162
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 265D90127C443765C115D53AA7E3C403C8AA422E9284E9F8461DE06232A572B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1716899397966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795397274194899162265D90127C443765C115D53AA7E3C403C8AA422E9284E9F8461DE06232A572B4