Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-28 23:13:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1841DDA66341F0F7FF47AC6FE7D1B1FD3712BF3D600B9FEC62DEA241263F89B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est important de rappeler que toute annotation sur un bulletin rend ce dernier « nul », et n’est donc pas comptabilisé. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vote_nul#:~:text=En%20France%2C%20le%20code%20%C3%A9lectoral,r%C3%A9sultat%20d'un%20scrutin%20public.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795397274194899162
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1841DDA66341F0F7FF47AC6FE7D1B1FD3712BF3D600B9FEC62DEA241263F89B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1716938029527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17953972741948991621841DDA66341F0F7FF47AC6FE7D1B1FD3712BF3D600B9FEC62DEA241263F89B3