Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-28 12:45:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Firstly, the UNWRA is mostly funded through the UN and UN Affiliated donors. Secondly the "independent" review has been shown that to contain bias. It is still could be valid to bring up said review as a coment, but not as a note. Sourve for the second point: https://unwatch.org/exposed-unrwas-rigged-independent-review/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795240763334316473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68
  • createdAtMillis - 1716900314316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17952407633343164730FC8282ED95F579520D64AA2E996D48DC00CF8FFBC932E0623FDB6783EF25B68