Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 21:08:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EB2C327D4A1923F3D7D5C10F9A130F51639036D83EE03595405B4030D709811
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hier wird suggeriert es handelt sich um einen "Gesundheitsvergleich" aber eigentlich ist es Schleichwerbung für ihr eigenes Produkt,was natürlich in ihrem "Wissenschaftlichen Test" auf Platz 1 landet . https://journalistikon.de/schleichwerbung/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795231255178444901
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EB2C327D4A1923F3D7D5C10F9A130F51639036D83EE03595405B4030D709811
  • createdAtMillis - 1717535336992
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17952312551784449015EB2C327D4A1923F3D7D5C10F9A130F51639036D83EE03595405B4030D709811