Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 21:57:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439
Participant Details

Original Note:

La CN es apropiada, si no te gusta que se evidencie que las encuestas en redes sociales son poco fiables vete a comentar, no uses CN para afirmar tu sesgo polĂ­tico. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2020/02/18/assessing-the-risks-to-online-polls-from-bogus-respondents/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795206017774706728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439
  • createdAtMillis - 1716847029097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17952060177747067281D1E42AFBD6B9DDA0FB87654AF2C96419EC7B65C131E645A09EECAD800E63439