Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 22:24:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE3D3F84229D3FB65FEE43CE411518E1F976A6CAB5B864B291AD10209AC2446C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post is clearly sharing the opinion that the naming scheme is asinine. Stating that the post misleading because of the the existence of the naming scheme is just as asinine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795172139215282358
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE3D3F84229D3FB65FEE43CE411518E1F976A6CAB5B864B291AD10209AC2446C
  • createdAtMillis - 1716848678682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1795172139215282358BE3D3F84229D3FB65FEE43CE411518E1F976A6CAB5B864B291AD10209AC2446C