Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-28 12:14:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93CF5D70E2D7B313BA3204B6824451BC71866A013A579EB5CD53C8A44963C0FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post is clearly sharing the opinion that the naming scheme is asinine. Stating that the post misleading because of the the existence of the naming scheme is just as asinine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795172139215282358
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93CF5D70E2D7B313BA3204B6824451BC71866A013A579EB5CD53C8A44963C0FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1716898484856
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179517213921528235893CF5D70E2D7B313BA3204B6824451BC71866A013A579EB5CD53C8A44963C0FF