Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-27 20:28:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65177D852D88C1A3EBF8136B6AEC01A6BFE32AB66E4124309C49E5D5DC6E7AAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post is clearly sharing the opinion that the naming scheme is asinine. Stating that the post misleading because of the the existence of the naming scheme is just as asinine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795172139215282358
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65177D852D88C1A3EBF8136B6AEC01A6BFE32AB66E4124309C49E5D5DC6E7AAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1716841708767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179517213921528235865177D852D88C1A3EBF8136B6AEC01A6BFE32AB66E4124309C49E5D5DC6E7AAC