Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 16:53:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 569D360F19F5FBF2DC53B537ADF6A503DB0CB70BB5202958CB1E3A20FEE70A46
Participant Details

Original Note:

Be sure to read the letter, not just the added underlines. It states that investigators just put this *on the board's agenda* in the category *for consideration of a violation.* While this is an important step, it's misleading to prematurely declare this a proven violation. https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1778962595212362021

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1795068446297694628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 569D360F19F5FBF2DC53B537ADF6A503DB0CB70BB5202958CB1E3A20FEE70A46
  • createdAtMillis - 1722790413826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1795068446297694628569D360F19F5FBF2DC53B537ADF6A503DB0CB70BB5202958CB1E3A20FEE70A46